Document Type : Regular Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Today oil, gas and petrochemical plants risk mitigation and management due to various aspects such as energy supply, financial implications, life loss and repairs has become a primary concern. One of the approaches that can be used for risk assessment of such these plants which are composed of different types of equipment and structures that have different responses and consequences is the probabilistic analysis. Flare is a process equipment that is widely used in oil, gas and petrochemical plants and depending on the height and type of lateral stability is categorized into self-supported, guy-supported and derrick-supported. In this article seismic behavior of a derrick-supported flare is investigated using finite element method and incremental dynamic analysis as a case study. For this purpose, various limit states were considered and for each of them a fragility curve is calculated and also presented with statistical parameters. The results showed that in ordinary seismic intensities there is no significant seismic demand on the investigated structure but in the range of rare intensities that can trigger technological disasters, there is probability of failure and consequently escalating the disaster.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1]     Di Sarno L, Karagiannakis G. On the seismic fragility of pipe rack—piping systems considering soil–structure interaction. Bull Earthq Eng 2020;18:2723–57. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00797-0.
[2]     Karimimalayer M. Evaluation on Capability of a Power Supply Company to Improve Environmental Management Systems According to Sustain Implementation of ISO 14001. Ind Eng Strateg Manag 2019;1:1–14. doi:10.22115/iesm.2019.87495.
[3]     Caputo AC, Vigna A. Numerical Simulation of Seismic Risk and Loss Propagation Effects in Process Plants: An Oil Refinery Case Study. Vol 8 Seism Eng, 2017. doi:10.1115/PVP2017-65465.
[4]     Eidinger JM. FRAGILITY OF NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS FOR FEMA BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS. n.d.
[5]     Rodolfo José Danesi Supervisors B, Bazzurro P, Vamvatsikos D. Seismic Risk of Industrial Plants: Assessment of a Petrochemical Piperack Using Incremental Dynamic Analysis 2015.
[6]     Bursi OS, Paolacci F, Reza MS. Performance-Based Analysis of Coupled Support Structures and Piping Systems Subject to Seismic Loading. Vol 8 Seism Eng, 2015. doi:10.1115/PVP2015-45123.
[7]     South Durban Community Environmental Alliance. Flaring at oil refineries in south Durban and Denmark. SDCEA; 2005.
[8]     Svensson B. Global Gas Flaring Reduction 2004:24.
[9]     American Petroleum Institute. Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems: API STANDARD 521 2014:260.
[10]    Sabry H, Dhabi A. SPE-188307-MS Integrity of LNG Flare Systems. 2017.
[11]    Papas M, Smith S, Zink D, Palfreeman N. Principals of flaring combustion and ways to minimize emissions and smoke design and case study of a new air injection system for upgrading exisiting flares into smokeless flaring. Soc Pet Eng - SPE Asia Pacific Oil Gas Conf Exhib 2010, APOGCE 2010 2010;3:1689–713. doi:10.2118/134067-ms.
[12]    Akeredolu FA, Sonibare JA. A review of the usefulness of gas flares in air pollution control. Manag Environ Qual An Int J 2004;15:574–83. doi:10.1108/14777830410560674.
[13]    Krausmann E, Cruz AM, Affeltranger B. The impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2010;23:242–8. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2009.10.004.
[14]    Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2002;31:491–514. doi:10.1002/eqe.141.
[15]    Vamvatsikos D. Seismic Performance, Capacity and Reliability of Structures as Seen Through Incremental Dynamic Analysis 2005:1–172.
[16]    Etli S, Güneyisi EM. Seismic performance evaluation of regular and irregular composite moment resisting frames. Lat Am J Solids Struct 2020;17:1–22. doi:10.1590/1679-78255969.
[17]    Chiou J-S, Chiang C-H, Yang H-H, Hsu S-Y. Developing fragility curves for a pile-supported wharf. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2011;31:830–40. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.01.011.
[18]    Kumar P, Pandey S, Maiti PR. A modified genetic algorithm in c++ for optimization of steel truss structures. J Soft Comput Civ Eng 2021;5:95–108. doi:10.22115/SCCE.2021.242552.1249.
[19]    Iervolino I, Cornell CA. Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthq Spectra 2005;21:685–713. doi:10.1193/1.1990199.
[20]    Chopra AK. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Dyn Struct Theory Appl to Earthq Eng 2012. doi:10.1002/9781118599792.