Document Type : Regular Article


1 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Sanjay Ghodawat University, Kolhapur, India

2 Professor and Head of the Department of Civil Engineering, Government Engineering College, Haveri-581101, Karnataka, India


According to current practices in earthquake engineering, and as per guidelines of codes the multistoried structures are analyzed and designed only for a single, rare design earthquake. In reality, most of the locations are affected by multiple earthquakes within short time intervals, also the repeated earthquake effect is ignored. The repeated earthquake affects the strength and stiffness degradation of the structure. In this paper4-, 8-, 12-, 16-storey structures are investigated under repeated earthquakes. The Time history analysis is performed with single, double, and triple earthquake events for calculating drift, displacement, and ductility. The result shows that the drift, displacement, and ductility demand increase with compared to a single earthquake. This research focuses on the study of the effect of a single and repeated earthquake on the multistoried structure and damage identification can be found using deformation in building frame or in frame element with the formation of plastic hinges. The default hinge properties are assigned to elements of structure and the study is carried out to find the location, formation of plastic hinges, and plastic hinge rotation due to repeated earthquake and this study is used to strengthening the element strength. This paper studies the interstory drift ratio and displacement under aftershocks of an earthquake and remedial measures are suggested to strengthen the structure capacity.


Main Subjects

[1]     Code P. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels Eur Comm Stand 2005.
[2]     FEMA 368: Seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. 2000.
[3]     IS ISC. 2002 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi 1893.
[4]     Amadio C, Fragiacomo M, Rajgelj S. The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non‐linear response of SDOF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2003;32:291–308.
[5]     Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE. Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes. Eng Struct 2009;31:2744–55.
[6]     MohdZulhsmAffandi bin MohdZahid, Majid TA, Faisal. A. effect of repeated near field earthquake to the high-rise RC building. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2012;6(10):129–38.
[7]     Hatzigeorgiou GD, Liolios AA. Nonlinear behaviour of RC frames under repeated strong ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2010;30:1010–25.
[8]     Dorri F, Ghasemi H, Nowak A. Developing a lateral load pattern for pushover analysis of EBF system. Reliab Eng Resil 2019;1:42–54.
[9]     Miranda E, Reyes CJ. Approximate lateral drift demands in multistory buildings with nonuniform stiffness. J Struct Eng 2002;128:840–9.
[10]   Zareian F. Simplified performance-based earthquake engineering. Stanford University; 2006.
[11]   Inel M, Ozmen HB. Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. Eng Struct 2006;28:1494–502.
[12]   SAP2000 CSI. Analysis reference manual. Comput Struct Inc, Berkley, California, USA 2003.
[13]   Walls SM. FEMA 356 Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, ASCE for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, November 2000. Forghani R., Totoev YZ y Kanjanabootra S., Experimental investigation of the water penetration through semi interlocking masonry (SIM) walls, Proc. Annual Meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan, Kobe, Japan, September 2014, pp. 889-890. Mason Soc J 2004;25:41–52.
[14]   Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. The incremental dynamic analysis and its application to performance-based earthquake engineering. Proc. 12th Eur. Conf. Earthq. Eng., vol. 40, 2002.